logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.04.07 2015나59240
손해배상
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a person who is working as a medical specialist in the GD hospital located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Plaintiff is a person who suffers from the scare infection and undergoes the knee-pathization of a diplomatic mission in the knee-knee on December 18, 2012 (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

B. While the Defendant had been carrying out the instant surgery, the Plaintiff voluntarily removed all knee cases of the Plaintiff’s both sides, and filed a complaint against the Defendant on the charge of causing occupational injury. However, on October 22, 2013 from the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office, the Defendant received a disposition without suspicion (Evidence of Evidence) on the ground that, in light of the fact that, after undergoing the instant surgery, the Plaintiff heard from the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office that “the Plaintiff asked the relevant party of the instant hospital about the knee-ray (kne-ray) of the kne-ray (kne-ray) of the Plaintiff’s kne-ray (kne-ray) as a result of the early wave of the instant hospital submitted by the Plaintiff as evidentiary material, the Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the instant surgery and filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant on the ground that there is no evidence proving the suspicion of occupational injury.”

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2

2. The allegations by the parties and the determination thereof

A. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant is obliged to pay 20 million won to the plaintiff in compensation for damages, since the defendant suffered from the pain that the defendant arbitrarily removed knee-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-s

In regard to this, the defendant is arguing that according to the ordinary operating method, the defendant removed knee-dele-mae-de-mae-de-mane-de-mane-de-mane-de-mane-knee-knee-kne-de-kne-kne-kne

B. Medical treatment shall be performed for the judgment of the defendant in implementing the instant surgery.

arrow