beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From October 19, 2008, when the Plaintiff had been knenee-free, he/she was administered by a hospital operated by the Defendant Medical Corporation C (hereinafter “Defendant Medical Foundation”) from around October 19, 2008 due to half-month heat, stypitis infection, etc. from the affiliated physician, and from the end of March 2010, he/she was conducted by Defendant B, who was a doctor belonging to the D Hospital, due to the lack of the above knee-free verification, and was conducted by the MRI on the left-hand side of April 1, 2010 after being diagnosed with the kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free felon-free felon surgery on April 27, 2010, which was conducted by the Defendant Medical Corporation No. 10335, Apr. 27, 2010.
B. Afterwards, the Plaintiff was diagnosed both knee-free knee-free salt by Defendant B at the D Hospital, and undergone surgery on March 15, 201, such as kne-free knee-free knee-free kne-free kne-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free gel-free
C. After that, the Plaintiff complained of both knenee and the right shoulder to be treated by being hospitalized in the heart of the D Hospital on February 18, 2014, and was operated from Defendant B on February 18, 2014 by Defendant B, on March 4, 2014, due to knee’s anti-feng-feng-feng-feng-feng-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-
Even after each of the above operations, the Plaintiff continued to appeal for the identification card and received treatment by transferring it to another hospital on July 7, 2014, and currently appeal for the identification card to both sides.
[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including the number of branch offices) and the result of physical appraisal by the court of first instance, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Plaintiff’s judgment on the cause of the claim is based on the Defendant.