The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 26, 2010, the Plaintiff was admitted to the hospital operated by the Defendant, and was diagnosed by kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free on each side. On March 29, 2010, the Defendant performed an

B. On August 17, 2010, the Plaintiff was undergoing a MaI test on the right-free knee, and at least 60% of the right-free kne-free gne-prone, respectively.

C. Around August 7, 2017, the Plaintiff received a simple square view surgery at a hospital located in Mayang-si, Jeonyang-si, and C Hospital presented a view that “The Plaintiff’s right-hand knee-snee-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se-se

On June 17, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the D Hospital located in Gwangjin-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City as “the anti-monthly malutism from the outside side of the U.S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2-1, Gap evidence 2-2, Gap evidence 3-1 to 3, Gap evidence 5-2, the result of the request for the appraisal of medical records to the E hospital of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. Plaintiff’s assertion 1) At the time of the instant surgery, the Plaintiff did not appeal to the right-free knee, and the Defendant did not want to conduct the instant surgery, without accurate diagnosis, performed the instant surgery to remove the right-free kne-free gne-free gne-free gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gne-gover around 2018.