1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, except for the addition of “additional Determinations” under the following, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is decided to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

2. The defendant asserts that the defendant should evaluate the operation by inserting knee knee knee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee snee.

The statements in the evidence Nos. 11, 12, and 13 alone are insufficient to recognize that the compensation is made in the case of disability equivalent to not less than 50% disability payment rate on both sides of the insurance business practice. There is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise, and even if so, in interpreting the special terms and conditions of this case, it does not necessarily have to be bound in the practice of the insurance business. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.