logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2018.01.23 2017고단363
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On December 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to occupational embezzlement, etc. in the support of Suwon Frigwon, which became final and conclusive on April 17, 2017.

[Criminal facts] "2017 Highest 363"

1. Fraud and occupational breach of trust were a person operating a DNA certified broker in C and 105, and around August 5, 2008, the defendant entered into a monthly rental agreement with the victim E, which is the above victim's ownership, and received rent, such as entering into a monthly rental agreement and receiving deposits, etc. from the above victim's wife G with the above victim's management of the above building. However, upon delegation from the above victim's wife G, the defendant received oral instructions from the above victim's wife G with the above victim's wife G to make a monthly rental agreement. Thus, in accordance with the good manager's duty, the defendant should enter into the monthly rental agreement on behalf of the above victim and receive the rent, such as lease deposit, etc. for the above victim, and then acquired the above lease agreement with the lessee after receiving the deposit money and concluded the lease agreement with the above lessee.

By remitting only the monthly rent deposit and the monthly rent, the fact of deceiving the money of the deposit by means of a hidden device was committed.

On April 24, 2009, the Defendant sought to lease the studio of the above building at the above D A certified broker office. “Around April 24, 2009, the Defendant was delegated by the owner of the building with the delegation of the lease agreement.”

With respect to the above building 204, a contract for the lease deposit of KRW 26 million may be concluded.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant was delegated the authority to enter into a monthly rent lease contract as above with regard to the above building 204 and did not have the intent or ability to enter into a rent lease contract.

The Defendant, from the victim H, on April 23, 2009.

arrow