Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the chief director of C High School Foundation, the victim D is the principal of C High School, and the victim E is the chief director of C High School Foundation at present.

1. On June 15, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim D, while there are all school staff members and staff members of the C High School Department in Ulsan-gun F, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, who are open in the C High School Department, including the assistant principal of the school, in relation to the appointment of the principal, the Defendant: (a) promised the victim D to the Defendant at a intervals of KRW 30 million in relation to the appointment of the principal; (b) delivered the amount of KRW 10 million among them; (c) at the time of the victim’s principal interview, E, at the time of the victim’s principal interview, money and valuables have been delivered to the victim via the Defendant

E and G granted the victim unfairly high interview points to the victim, and the victim did not receive money from the above school-related company when ordering the defendant, and despite the fact that the victim did not receive money from the above school-related company, the victim provided only KRW 10 million with respect to the appointment of the principal, and the defendant delivered part of the money received from the victim to E and G, thereby raising the interview points for the victim.

If the injured party did not receive money from the related company, it would not bring about money to Na when it is ordered.

“...........”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. On June 16, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E: (a) around 08:30, the Defendant granted money from the Defendant at the time of the appointment of the principal of the C High School; (b) the victim E received money from the Defendant at the time of the appointment of the principal of the D; (c) there was no fact that the Defendant did not return to working hours to transfer the said school foundation; and (d) the Defendant granted money in return for the appointment of the principal at the time of the appointment of the principal of the victimized person.