Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2017, the Defendants came to be Si expenses on the ground that the victim H (23 tax) and the victim I (24 tax) were born while fighting with other daily activities in the alley of the G restaurant located in the G cafeteriaF at the Scam of 01:25 on May 27, 2017, the Defendants came to be Si expenses for the reason that the victim H (23 tax) and the victim I (24 tax) were living in the chill. Defendant B was able to less the victim H’s h and take a drinking face, and Defendant A was also able to take the face of the victim H by combining them with the victim A.

The Defendants continued to restrain the victim I, and the victim I asked the victim I's face.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim H by the number of days of treatment, and the victim I placed the injury on the part of the victim I by the number of days of treatment.

[Defendant B and his defense counsel asserted that Defendant B left the scene of assault before the fighting occurred with the victims while denying the above facts charged.

However, in line with this court, the witness J, I, and H were in line with this court, and they first taken the attitude that Defendant B was able to do so, such as Defendant A, at the time, place, and place as stated in the above facts charged, and the victim H was able to do so, and immediately thereafter the Defendants committed assault by harming the victims.

A. The witness stated that he was accompanied by Defendant B at the date, time, and place stated in the facts charged, and that the several persons committed assault against the victims.

In full view of the circumstances up to the above violence, the circumstances at the time of the violence, and the situation before and after it, Defendant B may sufficiently recognize the fact that he participated in the violence with Defendant A and inflicted an injury on the victims as described in the above facts charged (the statement by the witness K, who stated Defendant B in advance at the scene of the violence, is insufficient to reverse the above recognition), and the above argument is not acceptable).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A witness J, I, .