Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On October 22, 2016, Defendant 2 and Defendant 2 jointly assaulted F with F on the ground that he was faced with F and the victim B (47 years) within the immediately preceding age in the Hatt G in Jung-gu, Seoul around October 23:30, 2016, on the ground that he was faced with F and the victim B (47 years) within the immediately preceding age. The Defendant was breading the victim’s face by drinking the victim’s face, cutting off the victim’s face, cutting off the victim’s face, taking the part of the victim’s head that was in excess of F, thereby causing the victim’s injury to the number of days of treatment.

B. The Defendant assaulted the Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph 1 to see the snow of the Victim I (47 years old) who was in action B.

2. Defendant B

A. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) committed an injury to the victim by jointly assaulting the victim, such as taking the victim A's face at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, taking the victim A's face at the place, taking the victim's face at the victim's face, and taking the victim's face at I, and taking the victim's face at the victim's face, in combination with the victim I.

B. The Defendant assaulted the victim F(48 years)’s chest on the date, time, place, and place specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The respective legal statements of the defendant and the witness A, the defendant B, the witness F, and the witness I

1. Investigation report (a photograph of the damaged condition of the suspect), each photograph of the suspect;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. A medical certificate of injury (J Council member), response to factual inquiries (J Council member) (a) acknowledged that the Defendants were drinking by each other, but did not assault each other in collaboration with F or I, and did not attack each other.

The argument is asserted.

However, Defendant B’s daily act recognizes the fact that Defendant B committed an assault against A at the date, time, and place specified in the above criminal facts, and also A is consistent with the investigation agency and this court.