Defendant

A A Fine of one million won, Defendant B (194 birth) of a fine of two million won, Defendant C of a fine of four million won, and Defendant C of a fine of four million won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants committed a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) by Defendant A, Defendant B (23) and Defendant C, on March 26, 2017, committed a dispute with the victim D (21 tax) for the reason that they faced with the Defendant A on the front of the Yung-si, Gangnam-si, the road of the victim D (21 tax) on March 26, 2017, on the ground that they faced with the Defendant A, the victim D (21 tax) was faced with the victim D (21 tax). Defendant A was tightly pushed the victim D (21 tax) on one occasion and pushed the body of the victim E (19 tax tax) on one occasion, and Defendant B (23 tax) on one occasion in drinking, and Defendant C was ske the face of the victim D (21 tax age) on the face of the victim and was ske the victim E.

The Defendants jointly assaulted victims D(21 3) and E as above.

2. Defendants D (21) and E committed a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) were at the time and place described in the above 1.1. The Defendants were at the time and place described in the above 1.1. The same circumstance as the mentioned in the above 1.3. When they were in dispute, Defendant E went beyond the victim’s bridge and went against the victim’s B (23.3). Defendant D (21 years old) took the face of the victim’s B (23 years old) by drinking, and Defendant D (21 years old) took the victim’s face one time after she went beyond the victim’s bridge, and she took the face of the victim’s B (23 years old) by drinking.

The Defendants jointly assaulted the victims A, B (23) and C as above.

3. The Defendant committed a crime interfering with Defendant C’s performance of official duties on the date, time, place, and the “fighting match took place.”

“A” means a slope H and assistant I belonging to the Gangnam Police Station G District of the Gangnam Police Station to arrest B(23) as a current offender after receiving 112 reports and having called B(23) to the site; “I is arrested of friend;

C. The Defendant expressed his desire to “Sero gue” and assaulted the said police officer’s body by hand.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the police officers’ legitimate execution of their duties regarding the handling of reported cases and the suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements 1.