Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who operated a mobile communications agency from Chuncheon City B to C, and D is a franchise that is to receive certain allowances when opening a mobile phone in the above C.

1. Around November 11, 2014, the Defendant of the document forgery and D entered “C” as “F, H, 401 in the phone number column, and entered as “F, G, and 401 in the phone number column,” written in “C,” and signed in the name of “E” and forged a smartphone service new contract (final number I) in the name of E with the intent to use the mobile phone opening revenue offered to the mobile phone agency for the mobile phone opening without permission of E in order to use the mobile phone opening revenue. On November 28, 2014, the Defendant of the document forgery and D forged a new contract for smartphone service in the name of E (final number I) with the intent to use the mobile phone opening revenue, and forged a new contract for smartphone service in the name of E in the same manner as the Defendant directly entered.

2. The Defendant forged each private document, as set forth in paragraph 1, and subsequently submitted each of the above private documents forged to the LG Plus as if they were a contract to be genuinely written to the LG Plus, and used them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of DNA by the police;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each application for membership;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the above investigation document) and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the frequency of the instant crime, and similar crimes.