The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around 10:06 on May 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) carried the victim D(39 years of age, leisure) into the water treatment room under the influence of alcohol; and (b) died and discarded all of the hospitals at the hospital; (c) in this context, the Defendant: (a) carried the victim’s bucks in the water treatment room in the East Sea; (d) the victim D (39 years of age, leisure); and (e) the victim D (39 years of age, leisure); and (e) died and discarded all of the hospitals at the hospital; and (e) the victim’s bucks in the right edge of the fuckbbbbbbbs; and (e) the victim’s fuck, using a smartphone, carrying the part of the victim’s fucks in the victim’s fluor; and (e) used the victim’s fluor for once in the instant car, and (e) used assault twice in the victim.

2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Code, which cannot be prosecuted against the intent expressed by the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Code.

However, according to the agreement bound in the trial records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.