(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단1662

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단1662

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is as follows: (a) around March 3, 2015, the Defendant: (b) around 12:30 on March 3, 2015; (c) the victim D who owns the land adjacent to the Defendant’s residence at the Defendant’s residence; and (d) the victim during dispute as to the opening of the house at the Defendant’s residence; (c) the victim, who was suffering from the knife of the horses and was in danger of being in the main line of the land; and (d) the knife (k) the knife (knife length: 25cm).

(e) Magres, dead, and discarded;

".............. the other hand carries the fat of the victim, drawing the fat of the victim into and out of the fat of the fat of the victim, taking the fat of the fats into the body, and "..........

It would be difficult to throw away because of the death of the person.

"A person who assaultss a victim".

On the other hand, the defendant denies that there is no fact of assaulting or threatening the victim while she has expressed his/her desire to do so to the victim.

Therefore, as stated in the facts charged, the victim's investigative agencies and the victim's statements in this court are practically concerned about whether the defendant assaulted the victim as stated in the facts charged and carried a dangerous knife with him/her.

In doing so, the victim has no consistency in this court’s statements, such as destroying several statements about who is a person who flats his flat and flats in and out of his flat, etc.

In addition, there is no objective evidence to support the victim's statement.

112 A witness E’s statement sent to the site upon receipt of a report is merely a seizure of a knife according to the victim’s land category, and without any evidence to acknowledge this point, the existence of a seized knife is also a knife at any house or room. Therefore, there is no evidence to support the victim’s statement on this point.

The defendant's statements and consistency in the specific situation at the time are also consistent.

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 2016.08.18 2016노280

-서울남부지방법원 2017.11.30 2017고단4609

-광주지방법원 2016.06.23 2016노821

-대구지방법원 상주지원 2021.02.24 2020고단322

-제주지방법원 2020.11.24 2020고단1165