2019Nu47584. Revocation of disposition, such as restriction on financing

A

Law Firm LLC et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant

[Defendant-Appellant]

The head of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office Seoul East Site

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2017Guhap56476 decided May 31, 2019

August 29, 2019:

September 26, 2019

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. On December 22, 2016, the Defendant’s return disposition of KRW 2,366,140 to the Plaintiff, additional collection disposition of the same amount, and disposition of restricting loans for 82 days shall be revoked, respectively.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this Court cites the reasoning in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

2. Conclusion

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

The presiding judge, judge and charter

Judges Dok-type

Judge Lee Young-young