beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
( state)C is a legal entity that supplies material to the Victim’s Western Development Co., Ltd., and the Defendant is in charge of the business affairs of the (State)C. On February 22, 2011, the Defendant, according to the supply contract, requested the Victim Company’s Thai Development Headquarters to conduct a material inspection of the samples of the product in question and confirmed the result from the Korea Testing Research Institute around March 31, 201, in order to supply “ Condenden 2S” to the Victim Company’s Thai Development Headquarters on February 22, 2011. The result of the strength test was 127 and the test result was 314 o’t.
1. On April 201, 201, the Defendant forged private documents at the Defendant’s home located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, a result of the test conducted by the Korea Test Research Institute issued by the Korea Test Institute to “ Condenser 2Sets”, which is a product to be supplied to the Victim Company’s Thai Development Headquarters at the Defendant’s home located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and then found the test result of the test conducted by using a computer hold-house program from 12.5 (127) to 15.4 (157) and the test result of the test conducted by the Defendant at the rate of further test from 314 to 414.
Accordingly, the defendant forged one copy of the test report in the name of the Korea Testing Research Institute for the purpose of exercising.
2. On April 7, 2011, the Defendant submitted one copy of the forged test report to the employee in charge of the victim company who is not aware of the fact, and exercised it.
3. On April 7, 2011, the Defendant supplied the relevant product to the C&O headquarters of the Victim Company as if the result of the material inspection on samples of the relevant product passed all the standards of material purchase specifications, as stated in paragraph (1).
around April 14, 2011, the defendant is the defendant from the victim company to the (State)C.