logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.08.20 2012가단14554
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff KRW 3 million with 5% per annum from May 1, 2012 to August 20, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a doctor who operates the “F Hospital” in Gwangju City E (hereinafter “instant hospital”).

Defendant B was a person who was treated at the instant hospital; Defendant C was a wife of Defendant B; Defendant D was a child of Defendant B.

B. Defendant B was diagnosed with the escape certificate of cryp vertebrate and the escape certificate of cryp signboards by visiting the instant hospital as a result of the crypization of the shoulder on September 10, 2011.

Since then, Defendant B suffered from the Plaintiff on September 15, 201 and September 19, 201, 201, the Defendant B received neutism on two occasions, and received neutical therapy on September 22, 2011.

C. Defendant B received medical treatment at another hospital due to symptoms that continue to provide pain and that with the right shouldering condition even after being treated with the Plaintiff, Defendant B suffers from the symptoms of chilling the right shoulder and restricting the exercise of the shoulder chilling.

The Defendants asserted that the above symptoms of Defendant B were due to the Plaintiff’s medical negligence, and demanded compensation from the Plaintiff, but were rejected.

1) Defendant B informed the newspaper reporters of the purport that “the Plaintiff was able to take severe pain while administering the Plaintiff’s drug, and the Plaintiff was satisfyed, and even after the satisfying pain, the lower part of the back part of the body satisfying, even after the satisfying pain.” Based on this fact, the article to the same purport as G and H was posted on the Internet bulletin board of the “Game Day”. (2) From April 12, 2012 to April 24, 2012, the Defendants stated that “the instant hospital satisfyed two times in the process of administering the Plaintiff’s drug, and caused the Defendant’s satisfy to make it difficult for the Defendant B to put the Defendant’s satisfy by administering two satisfys or injections in the instant hospital.”

arrow