1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim changed in this court, shall be modified as follows:

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff is a D Hospital located in Jinyang-si, Namyang-si (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) Defendant C is a doctor who has performed the above operation while working in the Defendant hospital as a medical specialist, and Defendant B is a person who employs Defendant C as the head of the Defendant hospital as a self-employed business owner.

B. Around February 25, 2010, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in Defendant Hospital on July 12, 2010, on the following: (a) the Plaintiff complained of the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral and both sides of the fluoral fluoral fluor, and symptoms of vain, and applied to Defendant Hospital; (b) the Gyeong MRI’s test conducted around February 27, 2010, showed an opinion on the escape from the cluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor. (c) The medical team at that time diagnosed the causes of the symptoms, such as the Plaintiff’s fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral flut.

3) On August 7, 2010, the Plaintiff was subject to Nonparty Hospital’s 4-5 surgery on the left-hand 5 malutism on the back-hand chronism. (4) On December 27, 2010, the Plaintiff complained that there was a recent frequent rupture rupture and vain on the left-hand bridge, and applied the Defendant Hospital to the Defendant hospital.

Defendant C, on December 28, 2010, deemed that there was an opinion on the Radical disease symptoms to the Plaintiff, had conducted the Radical MDR inspection. As a result of the inspection, Defendant C showed that the Radical pressure was expressed by the escape symptoms of conical signboards No. 4-5.

5 On November 2, 2011, the Plaintiff was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on the ground of the card on the left-hand bridge, and was subject to the neutical neutism and the neutism.

(c) No. 4-5.