1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Fact that there is no dispute over basic facts [based for recognition], entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5, 22, Eul evidence 4 (including provisional numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who received medical treatment, such as surgery conducted by Defendant B on July 22, 2011, as seen below at the Gangnam-gu Seoul E Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). Defendant C is an employer of Defendant Hospital’s medical staff, including Defendant B, who operates the Defendant Hospital.

B. From August 2010, the Plaintiff received medical treatment at multiple hospitals, such as the Atol University Seoul Escar Hospital. From November 29, 2010 to December 3, 2010, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the Hanyang University Hospital under the scopic scopic scoppy and the tension scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scop

C. On July 9, 2011, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital and received treatment from Defendant B. On the other hand, the Plaintiff complained of the back cover, the right side pain, and the two copies, and subsequently hospitalized in the hospital to undergo a close inspection. (ii) On July 20, 201, the Plaintiff hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital. (iii) On the other hand, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms, such as the following: (a) the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on July 20, 201; (b) the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital; (d) there was a serious number of symptoms at all times at the time of being hospitalized; (e) the back is fright, and (e) the Defendant complained of symptoms, such

In the physical examination, there was an opinion to lower the right upper corner, and as a result of the MRI examination of the MRI, it was the opinion on the escape from the post signboard between 5-6 and 5-6.

3) On July 22, 2011, Defendant B: (a) on July 22, 201, with respect to the Plaintiff, Defendant B performed the following surgery: (b) 5-6 square meters for removal of conical signboards and pelparing surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

(4) The Plaintiff discharged the Plaintiff on July 26, 201, while symptoms, such as pain, etc., become good after the instant surgery.

2. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows: (a) if Defendant B inserted the artificial bones as defined in the item with respect to the two copies of appeal mainly filed by the Plaintiff, the oxygen supply becomes smooth and two copies disappear.