logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2014.06.11 2012가단19856
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person engaged in the business of leasing construction materials, and the Defendant is the intention to operate the “D Hospital” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) in Gwangju City.

B. From September 2, 201 to August 8, 201 of the same month, the Plaintiff appeared from the construction site, and after completing the work, there was symptoms that it is impossible for the Plaintiff to properly drive the shoulder at the right shoulder, and from the Defendant’s hospital on the 10th of the same month, the Plaintiff was diagnosed that the symptoms shown by the Plaintiff were caused by the following symptoms, in light of the results of the examination: (a) the Defendant was sent to the Defendant’s hospital; (b) the Defendant was subject to physical inspection, such as Sping T and Epling Test; (c) the Defendant was suspected to be the escape certificate of light-string signboards; (d) the X-ray test and self-registered video image (MRI); and (e) the Defendant was diagnosed that the symptoms shown by the Plaintiff were caused by light of the above inspection results.

C. On September 15, 2011, the Plaintiff re-entered to the Defendant Hospital, and received the negotition from the Defendant on the right side side side of the border No. 4-5, and immediately thereafter, the pains of the right shoulder was alleviated daily, and the pains have deteriorated again.

Accordingly, on the 19th day of the same month, the Plaintiff, who was inside the Defendant hospital, was administered by the Defendant at the right side of the 3-4th day of the border line, in a fluencing surgery and the right shoulder, respectively. D.

After that, on September 22, 2011, the Plaintiff left the Defendant hospital with no pain of the right shoulder, and was under a re-exploitation of the flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium to the right shoulder from the Defendant, the Plaintiff did not visit the Defendant hospital thereafter because there was no symptoms flusium.

E. After the Plaintiff’s occurrence of symptoms with a declineing the right shoulder, the Plaintiff was sent to the Defendant Hospital on October 11, 201, and was subject to the Defendant’s recommendation to undergo a transition test at a nearby Gal and Hospital, and was diagnosed by the Defendant on October 12, 201 of the same month.

(f).

arrow