1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The entry in the forest survey report and the Defendant’s registration of preservation of ownership in the forest survey report on the forest land of F, G, and H on April 29, 1919 that E residing in E, G, and H on April 29, 1919 (eight years in 8 years in Gyeong-gun), which were drafted during the Japanese occupation period, was entered as the name of the administrative district of F, G, and H on April 29, 19 (Evidence A) was changed. The name of the administrative district of G, K, and L, which was restored from around 1967 to around 1968, was changed. The former owner of each of the above land was M on May 19, 1960, and the ownership preservation registration was completed under the Defendant’s name as the receipt of the Suwon District Court branch on the same day (Evidence 2 and 3).

(A) The name of the administrative district was changed to the Dong-dong, Gyeonggi-do, Innju-gun, Gyeonggi-do (No. 2, 3, and 5) thereafter, and the said J, K, and L land are each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”).

B) A. B. The Plaintiff’s preference P.O. (1) on January 20, 1921, M. L. and July 7, 1923, 1923, died in Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul. On November 10, 1925 (14 years), U succeeded to Australia as the wife of theO, and was transferred to V in the Gyeonggi-do. on the same day.

(A) The aboveO died on April 25, 1965, after being married with Y on August 28, 1907, 1907 (No. 6, 7) X, which was a son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s Z, AAB, AB, AC, and AE, among them, died on August 9, 197; the ZF died on April 17, 1996; the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son and son’s son’s son’s son’s son.