1. The defendant shall receive on November 7, 1986, from the plaintiff, the head of Suwon District Court with respect to the size of 4066 square meters of B forest land at the time of Innju.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 30, 1920, the Forest Survey Division of Gyeonggi-gun C, which was prepared during the Japanese occupation occupation period, stated that E residing in G, G, G, G, and G, G, G, and E, which was assessed on April 30, 1920.

B. Since then, the administrative district was changed to Dong Dong-dong, and H forest was divided into B, I, and J in 1966 after the cadastral record was destroyed due to the disturbance.

(B) The forest land of this case is not less than 406 square meters among them).

On November 7, 1986, the defendant completed registration of preservation of ownership of the forest of this case.

In the old land cadastre drawn up in 1967, the owner of the forest of this case is K.

E. On November 10, 1925, E, who had a domicile in the Gansung L, died in the Gansung M, and on December 2, 1925, N succeeded to Australia as the wife of NO, and transferred to Paju-gun of the same game day. 2) O only Q, other than N, did not have any son, and R, who was an Ean Dongdong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, was married to S on August 28, 1907, which was prior to the death of O.

3) The R died on April 25, 1965. At the time of the death of R, there was son X, Y, and Y coming from ASEAN, U,V, W and her running, and among them, T died on August 9, 197, and Z on April 17, 1996. The Plaintiff, AA, AB, and AC (AD) died before T was dead.

) AE (which is children between T and the former AF) shall be his or her children.

(AG, AH, and his wife were all married before the death of TW. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including virtual numbers, fact-finding about the leisure market, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

(a) In the absence of any counter-proof such as a change in the content of an adjudication, the person registered as the owner in the land survey register or the forest survey register in the name of the defendant shall be presumed to have been the owner of the land, and such circumstance shall be presumed to have become final and conclusive, and the person in receipt of the assessment of the

Supreme Court Decision 98Da13686 delivered on September 8, 1998, etc.