1. The defendant shall keep in sequence each point indicated in the separate sheet No. 44, 42, 5, 6, 43, 40, and 44, which are indicated in the separate sheet No. 1.

Facts of recognition

Gyeonggi-gun Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul-gun”) was under the circumstances of D on March 25, 1912, and the address of the land investigation injury D was “Seongbuk-J”.

From the assessment land on September 13, 1976, F Return 33 of Gyeonggi-gun was divided, and the remaining land among the assessment land was 44 square meters on the road due to the change of land category.

After that, C. C. 44 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) was later converted into the area of 145 square meters on November 18, 2002, and was merged into the real estate listed in the attached Table No. 1 on November 18, 2002. Of the real estate listed in the attached Table No. 1 of the same Table, the portion corresponding to the instant land among the real estate listed in the attached Table No. 1 of the same Table is 14,42,5,6,43,40,400 square meters connected in sequence of each point indicated in the attached Table No. 44, 42, 5,

F. F. F. F. F. F. F. 3 of the said Gyeonggi-gun was converted into the area and became the real estate listed in attached Table 2 of the attached Table (hereinafter “instant land”).

On the other hand, with respect to the land of this case on January 5, 1996, registration of preservation of ownership in the name of each defendant was completed with respect to the land of this case on April 8, 1996.

G, who is the plaintiffs' preference, was transferred to the G G, the father of the G on June 16, 1913, to the G G, the G, the G, the his father of which was the G, but died on July 29, 1950, and the J, the son of the son, was the sole heir of the family head, and the J died on July 15, 1997 and became the co-inheritors.

[Based on recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 through 13 (including branch numbers), the result of the appraisal commission to the appraiser K of this court, the overall purport of the plaintiffs' claim, and the fact inquiry to the head of Jongno-gu Seoul District Court, together with the overall purport of the oral argument, are the same as Gap evidence and video evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 through 13 (including branch numbers), and as a result of the fact inquiry to the head of Jongno-gu Seoul District Court as to the overall purport of the oral argument. In other words, the assessment title of the circumstance land and the plaintiffs' preference are the same as "L" for all the names