Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff 1 and 2 others (Law Firm Ham, Attorney Kang Jong-sik, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
Defendant church (Attorney Park Jong-soo, Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
April 27, 2006
The first instance judgment
Seoul Western District Court Decision 2005Kahap5164 Delivered on December 2, 2005
Text
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. It is confirmed that the non-party is not the representative of the defendant.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasons why a member should explain this case are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the plaintiffs' appeal.
Judges Kang Young-ho (Presiding Judge)