beta
Plaintiff and appellant
Plaintiff 1 and three others (Law Firm Jinjin, Attorneys Noh Young-hee, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)
Defendant, Appellant
Defendant (Law Firm LLC, Attorneys Han-ho et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)
Intervenor joining the Defendant
Korea
Conclusion of Pleadings
November 19, 2009
The first instance judgment
Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gahap78458 Decided June 16, 2009
Text
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
The part regarding the plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked. The defendant will implement the procedure for the cancellation of ownership transfer registration, which was completed on January 3, 2008 by the Seoul Central District Court’s registry No. 274 with respect to each land specified in the list No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance with respect to the non-party 1 (the non-party 1) (the non-party 1 (the
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of the judgment of the court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and the part concerning the plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance is just and there is no ground to appeal against it, and it is dismissed in its entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Kang Young-ho (Presiding Judge)