[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months and a fine of five million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who operates a sexual traffic business in the name of “F marina” on the second and second floor of Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun.

From January 26, 2017 to February 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) sought the place from the above F Maz; and (b) received 100,000 won from the customers, and (c) had female employees, such as G, engage in sexual intercourse with customers; and (d) mediated sexual traffic.

2. Although Defendant B was aware of the fact that the above building was provided as a commercial sex act by the Hongsung-gun’s owner-ro and the Hongsung Police Station around July 25, 2016, the Defendant provided the building continuously in accordance with a lease agreement on the second floor of the above building that was concluded around April 8, 2016, and had a female employee, such as G, etc. engage in commercial sex acts by receiving KRW 100,000 won from a customer who found the said place from January 26, 2017 to February 8, 2017 and receiving KRW 100,000 from the customer who found the said place and received a sexual sex act with the customer.

As a result, the defendant provided a building to A with the knowledge of the fact that he is provided with sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant B and the defense counsel regarding the real estate lease agreement and the notice thereof

1. On July 2016, the Defendant was notified by the Hongsung Police Station that a sexual traffic business establishment is being operated in the building located in Hongsung-gun E (hereinafter “instant building”) owned by the Defendant, and requested the Defendant A not to absolutely commit a tort related to sexual traffic in the said building, and the Defendant A would no longer engage in sexual traffic business.

Since the above building was promised to be provided for sexual traffic, it is not provided with the building knowing that it was provided for sexual traffic.

2. The judgment is known to provide sexual traffic.