logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.01.19 2016고단2584
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On April 5, 2016, Defendant A issued a summary order of KRW 5 million on the grounds of the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A is a person who, from June 9, 2015, made six partitions with a diameter of 132 square meters in Soyang-gu E and 2 stories, and operated “G” marina business by employing F (e.g., age 53) as an employee, from Jun. 9, 2015 to Jun. 9, 2015.

Even after the Defendant’s control over the above establishment on October 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around April 27, 2016, around 22:30, the Defendant provided customers with KRW 100,000,000, and (b) provided them with one room, and (c) provided them with a female employee of sexual traffic waiting in the waiting room.

It shall be sent to women as a room in which customers are waiting, with the case of being able to know, one Red Sea, and one of them.

male guests and sexual intercourses were made.

In addition, the Defendant employed female employees, such as F, from April 6, 2016 to April 27, 2016, and received total of KRW 820,000 from customers and arranged commercial sex acts for business purposes.

2. No person who intends to provide funds, land, or buildings with sexual traffic shall be aware of the fact that such goods are provided for sexual traffic;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as the owner of Gyeyang-gu E and the second floor at the time of the enhancement of the foregoing “(1)”, continued to lease from the control to April 27, 2016, even though he/she was aware that the said A had been engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic on October 22, 2015, and was provided for sexual traffic.

As such, the Defendant provided a building knowing that sexual traffic is provided.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement (as to Defendant A)

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. Testimony to the effect that the witness has operated his/her business without changing the business type, trade name, internal structure, etc. even after crackdown A;

1. At the time of the first crackdown on the suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B.

arrow