logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.31 2014가단5127304
양수금
Text

1. As to KRW 81,817,553 and KRW 43,610,677 among the Plaintiff, Defendant A shall be annually from May 21, 2014 to the full payment system.

Reasons

1. A cited part;

A. Claim No. 1) Defendant A concluded a general loan loan agreement or credit card use agreement from the financial institutions listed below and took out loans, but failed to pay as of May 20, 2014 as indicated below (unit costs). Defendant A received the loan from Defendant A with credit card holders 2,012,730 1,816,682 3,829,412 11,862,422, 12,458,376 24,320,798 SB I2 Savings Bank loan No. 3,297,8252,89,646,47,468, Samsung Card No. 6375,437,405,405,2616,387, 305, 187, and 305,375, 1987, and 197,305,205,375, and 1637,287.

(b) Judgment by service based on which recognition is applicable (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The dismissal portion of the Plaintiff asserted that Defendant B was jointly and severally liable to pay the principal and interest of the above loan to the Plaintiff as it jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant A’s SB I2 Savings Bank. However, in addition to the calculation statement of principal and interest (Evidence A 2), there is no evidence to prove that Defendant B jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant B’s obligation to the SBI2 Savings Bank. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow