logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.26 2014가단5085776
양수금
Text

1. Defendant A’s ratio of 113,955,689 won and 34,630,257 won among them to 17% per annum from March 12, 2014 to full payment.

Reasons

1. A cited part;

A. The Plaintiff received 1,631,321 5,08, 2079, 719,528, 528 2, 200. 24,440,55,335, 995, 335 14,742,871, 8714 new card loan 11,816,698, 341, 257, 955, 528, 395, 353 of 200. 29. 29. 14,742, 928, 939, 943, 56, 8714, 11,698, 341, 257, 955, 34, 6305, 257, 294, 251, 3614, 2965, 201.

(b) Judgment by service based on which recognition is applicable (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The Plaintiff asserts that (i) Defendant A received special claim 1,559,284 won (i.e., 750,000 won interest in arrears) from Defendant A, and (ii) Defendant B jointly and severally guaranteed Defendant A’s obligation with respect to credit card payment under the No. 3 of the above table.

In 198, Defendant A made a loan from a national bank, a principal loan institution.

No evidence exists to deem that Defendant B provided joint and several surety for Defendant A’s new card payment. Thus, this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow