The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the defendant's mistake is divided, and the defendant actively cooperates in the investigation.

However, the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crimes, even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant simply possessed or administered phiphones, and sold phiphones without being limited to the mere possession or medication of phiphones, and the frequency of the crimes reaches several times, taking into account the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Therefore, the above assertion by the Defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.