The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s mistake is divided and appears to have actively cooperated in the investigation.

However, the crime of this case is deemed unfair because the defendant arranged the sale and purchase of phiphones and administered phiphones, and the nature of the crime is not very good. The defendant repeats the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime resulting from the same crime even though he had the same kind of criminal record at several times, in consideration of the balance of punishment with the crime of this case, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of the punishment specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.