The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The Defendant asserts that, on the grounds of the instant appeal, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

The circumstances that actively cooperate in the investigation of this case are recognized, such as the fact that the defendant reflects the defendant's mistake in depth, and that the defendant was domestic first offender, and that actively cooperate in the investigation of this case.

However, there are many times for the defendant to administer philophones, and the period is also reasonable.

In particular, it seems that the amount of philophones possessed or kept by the defendant is very large and the act of spreading philophones is also involved.

In light of the aforementioned circumstances, there is no change in the circumstance and method of the instant crime, frequency and scale of the crime, motive for the crime, circumstances after the crime, punishment records, and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, career, home environment, etc., and all of the circumstances, which form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the trial and oral argument, compared with the original court. In full view of all of the aforementioned circumstances, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no reason to appeal.