The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the defendant divided his mistake and actively cooperated in the investigation.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to be unfair because the defendant traded, administers, possessed, or disturbed phiphones, and the nature of the crime is not very good. The defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crimes for the same kind of crime even though he had a previous conviction at several times, and the frequency of the crimes has reached and handled several times, and the number of times of the crimes has been assigned, and considering the sentencing balance with the crimes of this case, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment is too excessive and unfair. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.