logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.24 2012가단113238
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A, KRW 2,705,518, and KRW 644,584, and KRW 1,270,50, and Plaintiff C.

Reasons

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of the facts alleged in Gap's evidence 1 to 4, 6 to 9, 11, 12, Eul's evidence 2, 4, 5, and 7 (including additional numbers) and the witness G's testimony.

(1) The status of the party (1) Plaintiff A is a person operating the Yang Chang-gun in the name of "J" in the Jeonbuk-gun I, and Plaintiff B is a person operating manufacturing business, such as the mutual benefit of "L" in "L" in Gyeonggi-si. Plaintiff C is a person operating the NA in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M as a "N publishedwon". Plaintiff D is a person operating the golf practice range under the trade name of "P K driving range" in "O in Busan-gu, Busan, and Plaintiff E and F are children who suffered an accident that is confined to apartment elevators as of September 15, 201, which is seen next.

(2) The Defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation is an operator of the electric utility business who runs the electric transmission business, the electric distribution business, and the electric sales business under the Electric Utility Act. The Defendant Korea is a person who, in order to establish a basic system on the electric utility business under the Electric Utility Act and promote competition in the electric utility business, permits or cancels the electric utility business in order to promote the sound development of the electric utility business and protect the interests of consumers, thereby contributing to the development of the national economy, and supervises the electricity supplier or the electric utility supplier by ordering the electricity supplier, etc. to adjust the supply and demand of electricity and by taking measures such as the suspension of

B. (1) The conclusion of the electricity supply contract (1) On December 9, 2003, Plaintiff C entered into a respective electricity supply contract with the Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter “instant contract”), around June 201, Plaintiff B, the Plaintiff A, Apr. 12, 201, and Plaintiff D, upon filing an application for the respective electricity use with the Defendant Electric Power Corporation at the time of the annual refund.

arrow