logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2016.12.22 2015가단30229
전기위약금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,950,878 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 20% per annum from August 13, 2015 to September 30, 2015, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established under the Korea Electric Power Corporation Act for the purposes of the development, development, transmission, and distribution of electric resources and its related businesses, and is an operator of the electric utility business who runs the electric transmission business, the electric distribution business, and the electric sales business under the Electric Utility Act, and the Defendant is a local government that manages the original water purification room used by the

B. On January 18, 200, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a contract on the supply of electricity to an industrial power plant (A), contract-based 300kW, and the purpose of the use of electricity (hereinafter “the instant supply contract”) with the Plaintiff to supply electricity to the Defendant’s 5-6 ground water purification plant at the cost of the Defendant’s management (hereinafter “the instant supply contract”).

Although the head of the original city waterworks business office is the contracting party, there is no dispute over the effect of the contract on the defendant.

The electricity supply contract of February 12, 2014 is also the same.

In the instant supply contract, the Plaintiff agreed to comply with the terms and conditions of the electricity supply for matters not specified in the contract.

The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with electricity in accordance with the instant electricity supply contract from around the time of the instant electricity supply contract to January 2014.

C. On May 30, 2010, the Defendant newly constructed an integrated building of the Water and Wastewater Works Headquarters (hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground of the 511-4 Sinsan-dong 5, Masan-si, and used electricity supplied to the Defendant under the instant electricity supply contract without concluding a separate electricity supply contract with the Plaintiff for the instant building.

With respect to electricity supplied to the instant building on February 12, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant are called “electric power supply contract on February 12, 2014,” which was concluded on February 12, 2014, by separating industrial and general electricity under the electricity supply contract.

AB concluded the agreement.

The electricity supply contract dated February 12, 2014 is the entire main water purification plant including the instant building.

arrow