A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who was demanded to submit a certificate of high school graduation in order to convert to regular positions while working in a contract-based company C, and the defendant, who was not in the middle of high school retirement, was willing to forge and submit a certificate of success in the certification of high school graduation academic background.

On April 2013, the Defendant consulted with the Defendant’s residence in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 202, through the e-mail address (F) of E-mail, which was known through the search at the Internet NAV website, and provided personal information, such as the Defendant’s name and date of birth, to the above E. In receipt of the Defendant’s pass certificate forgery cost and personal information, and then requested the Defendant to forge the pass certificate, and then forged the pass certificate to the Defendant whose official seal was affixed to the name of the chairman of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Examination and Public Notice Committee, and then printed out two copies of the pass certificate using the above NAF via the e-mail address (F).

As a result, the defendant, in collusion with the above E and non-francing criminal, forged two copies of the pass certificate in the name of the chairman of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Examination and Notification Committee for the purpose of exercising the certificate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each pass certificate;

1. Articles 225 and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., extenuating circumstances that may be considered in the course of criminal conduct, including the fact that the exercise of a forged document does not reach the exercise of one’s wrongness, and that one’