beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 70,000,000 for the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); KRW 43,000,000 for the appointed Party B; KRW 7,000,00 for the appointed Party C; and
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a company with the objective of trucking consignment management business, etc.
B. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) and the Appointed Party (excluding the Appointed Party M) and N respectively entered into an entrustment management contract with the Defendant for the entrusted operation of the branch and local office of the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”). The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) as the deposit for the instant contract, the amount of KRW 70,000,000, the amount of KRW 43,000,000 for the Appointed Party B, the amount of KRW 7,000,000 for the Appointed Party C, the amount of KRW 1,00,000 for the Appointed Party E, the amount of KRW 3,00,000 for the Appointed Party E, and KRW 5,00,000 for the Appointed Party G, KRW 5,000,000 for the Appointed Party G, KRW 00,000 for the Appointed Party and KRW 4000,000 for the Appointed Party.
C. On September 13, 2010, the Plaintiff and the designated parties (excluding the designated parties M) sent to the Defendant a content-certified mail stating the Defendant’s declaration of intent to terminate the instant contract through a two-month reorganization period (hereinafter “instant termination notice”). Around that time, the Defendant sent the instant termination notice to the Defendant.
After that, M acquired the status of the instant contract from N on October 28, 2010, and acquired N’s claim for the refund of deposit against N.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 7, 9, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, it shall be deemed that the contract of this case was terminated upon the termination of two months after the notice of termination reaches the Defendant, and barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff and the designated parties the deposit and the damages for delay received under the contract of this case.
3. The judgment of the defendant's assertion is that the plaintiff and the designated parties are not related to the settlement and payment of daily fees, and the termination of the contract of this case.