Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff (appointed party) KRW 4,190,00, KRW 3,405,00 to the Selection B, and KRW 5,580,00 to the Selection C, respectively.
Reasons
1. According to the purport of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Gap evidence Nos. 9-1 and 2 as to the cause of the claim, the defendant employed the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed parties (hereinafter "the plaintiff (appointed party") who were originally employed for the production of mobile toilets from July 1, 2015 to September 3, 2015, 300, 600, 300, 6,005, 6,000 won and 6,000 won and 6,05,000 won and 7,000 won and 7,637,50,500 won and 60,000 won and 6,000 won and 6,000 won and 6,000 won and 7,637,50,000 won and 7,500 won and 7,50,000 won and 606,000 won and 7,706,06,00 won and 6.
2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion
A. The defendant asserts that the person who employs the plaintiffs is not the defendant, but the steel source corporation. However, according to the evidence mentioned above, the person who employs the plaintiffs can be acknowledged as the defendant. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
B. The Defendant transferred the claim against the Shin & Construction Co., Ltd. to N., Ltd., and the Iron Co., Ltd., Ltd., the above claim.