(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.02.04 2019가단19586

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.02.04 2019가단19586

대여금 등

Text

The defendant falls under each of the following subparagraphs for the plaintiff (the selected party) and the remaining sperm in the attached list (won) column.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the defendant; (1) the plaintiff (Appointed Party); (2) the plaintiff (Appointed Party); (3) the plaintiff (Appointed Party); and (49,000,000 won on August 21, 2018; and (4) the selection of the plaintiff (Appointed Party); and (3) the total amount of KRW 35,000,000 on August 27, 2018; and (3) the amount of KRW 14,00,000 on July 30, 2018; and (4) the selection of KRW 0,000,000 on August 14, 2018; and (4) the selection of KRW 0,000 on August 14, 200; and (5) the selection of KRW 7,000,000 on August 14, 2018.

With respect to the amount of loan of prior sperm E, the Plaintiff (the Selection Party) received from the Defendant not only KRW 7,00,000 from September 5, 2018, but also KRW 7,000,000 from the Defendant as above, August 17, 2018, KRW 21,000,000 on August 23, 2018, and KRW 14,000,000 on August 21, 2018, and KRW 14,00,000 on August 27, 2018, and KRW 7,00,000,00 on August 30, 208, and did not receive the remainder of KRW 7,00,000 on September 27, 200, 200 on the remainder of the loan.

1.3 Sees the purport of this title.

However, there is no evidence to prove that the appointed party E lends the sum of KRW 70,000,000 to the defendant, as alleged by the plaintiff (the appointed party).

The above argument of the plaintiff (the appointed party) is without merit.

B. The judgment of the defendant's assertion (1) is first, the defendant refers to the plaintiff (the appointed party) and the remaining sperm, with the exception of Gap's certificate No. 1-8 of the loan certificate.

Preparation and delivery of Eul is true, but it is only prepared and delivered by the plaintiff (the designated party) and the remaining winners in the process of investing funds related to the purchase of merchandise coupons in H, and the defendant merely received the investment money in the name of H in the process of investing the funds related to the purchase of merchandise coupons in H.

Therefore, the plaintiff(s) and the remainder.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원여주지원 2017.06.14 2015가합518

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.01.12 2016가단23153

-부산지방법원 2011.08.18 2011가합8457

-춘천지방법원속초지원 2014.12.09 2014가단743