logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.05.19 2012가합32795
손해배상 청구의 소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties to the dispute are the buyers of the apartment complex in the lubow in the Seo-gu Incheon Western District A-7 block lubow (hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case"), and the defendant is the contractor of the apartment of this case.

B. After the conclusion of the sales contract on the apartment of this case, the Defendant held a DNAF event (Degrative CF), which gives the buyer an opportunity to change the interior finishing materials or design in accordance with the direction or symbol for the buyer of the apartment of this case from January 7, 2011 to January 9, 2011. 2) The contents of the exercise of DCF are comprised of three major parts, but the first is the choice to change the internal finishing materials in the household, the second is the direction of the floor and the child bank, and the third is the TBI air conditioner, which is being carried out with the third payment.

Among them, the internal finishing change in the household is about seven items (1: papering, 2: general household, 3: household, main household, 4: 5, 6,000,000, and 7: Doggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

C. The Plaintiffs entered into the DCF contract between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant with the Defendant during the period of the said exercise, according to the Plaintiffs’ individual internal finishing materials and design choice, and thereafter, the Defendant entered into the DCF contract (hereinafter “instant DCF contract”). Since then, the Defendant constructed the instant apartment in accordance with the DCF contract.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. In fact, the plaintiffs' claim for damages arising from the tort is based on the DCF contract of this case.

arrow