logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2019.11.21 2019가합149
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant shall pay KRW 3,508,541 to the plaintiff.

2. The defendant shall supply and make hot water with regard to D Apartments and E in light name.

Reasons

1. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the owner of the D apartment and Fho (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s apartment”). The Defendant is the owner of the Plaintiff’s apartment immediately above the Ma apartment and E (hereinafter “Defendant’s apartment”), and the Defendant’s incidental C and G are residing in the Defendant’s apartment.

Since around 2014, water leakage occurred in the toilets of the apartment of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff suffered serious inconvenience for a long time. As such, ① from May 1, 2014 to the 4,950,000 won for repairing the defects of the apartment owned by the Defendant, the amount of KRW 3,000,00 each month from May 1, 201 to the date of completion of the interior waterproof treatment of the toilets of the apartment owned by the Defendant, and the date of completion of the toilet leakage prevention work of the apartment owned by the Plaintiff, ② the payment of KRW 508,541 for the tent reconstruction cost of the Plaintiff’s toilet and ② the payment of KRW 508,541 to the Plaintiff’s toilet reconstruction work inside the Defendant apartment, and the Plaintiff’s interior and reconstruction work inside the Plaintiff’s apartment toilet.

2. Determination

A. Determination 1 on the claim for damages) Evidence A Nos. 1, 6, and 8 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) establishing the claim for damages

As a result of the on-site verification by the court prior to transfer, in full view of the results of the appraiser H’s appraisal of this court’s appraiser H and the overall purport of the pleadings, the Defendant, a structure, can be acknowledged that the water supply pipe’s water supply pipes (in order to inserting the water supply pipe, water flows into the pipe buried at the time of concrete burning, water flows out from the pipe installed at the time of inserting concrete, and water supply/supply pipe installed in the Plaintiff’s public toilet site in the above public pipe, water supply/supply pipe installed in the Plaintiff’s public toilet site, and that the water pollution and dysation of the Plaintiff’s public toilet site were occurred due to the above water leakage, and according to the above facts, the Defendant, a structure.

arrow