A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, with the intention of paying KRW 2 million per unit of the export declaration completion certificate, etc. from the person “D” in the Philippines, by altering the export declaration certificate, etc., reported export to the customs house as if he were exported of the motor vehicles that had already been registered for cancellation, and used the used motor vehicle to be exported overseas by altering the chassis number stated in the column of the export declaration certificate and the column of the export declaration declaration declaration certificate into the chassis number of the motor vehicle that cannot be exported because it was not registered for cancellation.

1. Around July 29, 2013, the Defendant altered the official document’s export declaration form, which is an official document, for the purpose of exercising the export declaration number in the name of the Incheon Customs by using an export declaration number in the “ model specification” column of the export declaration number in the Nowon-gu nuclear site without authority for the purpose of exercising the right in the original non-permanent area of Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, 2013, and subsequently altered seven copies of the export declaration form, which is an official document, for the purpose of exercising the export declaration number in total seven times from around that time to August 6, 2013, and exercised the export declaration number altered around that time to the Hancheon-ri, Inc., a combined freight forwarder.

2. Around March 5, 2013, the Defendant altered the letter of export declaration, which is a private document, for the purpose of exercising the above method 67 times in total, as stated in the alteration of a private document, and subsequently exercised 67 copies of the letter of export declaration, which is a private document, for the purpose of exercising the above method over 67 times from the time of the alteration of the private document, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant changed the J’s report number under the name of a licensed customs broker H by using the Noart North Korea’s Pototool program without authority for the purpose of exercising the right in the Gu-U.S., Nowon-si; (b) and (c) the combined freight forwarder changed the report number under the name of a licensed customs broker to the “K” column of the model specification of the I approved export declaration.

2...