A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who worked as the head of the business division from September 4, 2006 to November 30, 2010 in the C operation located in the Busan Young-gu, Busan Metropolitan City from November 30, 201.

On March 20, 2009, the Ulsan Eastern Power Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea Eastern Power Co., Ltd.") entered into a contract for the purchase of goods on the circular pumps, Salft and Sleeve (in developing power, the leaving to the S team is moving to the Sleve, and the sea water is spreading if cooling is done.).

On March 20, 2009, the Defendant: (a) requested the Ulsan Telecommunication Headquarters to submit a test report on the materials of the above product from the Republic of Korea, and requested the Busan and Ulsan Industrial Complex to conduct a test on the materials of the above product; (b) however, the Defendant had been willing to arbitrarily correct the above product because the reported test report falls short of the standard of content required by the Ulsan Power Headquarters for the Development of the Republic of Korea.

2. On April 7, 2009, the Defendant, without authority, modified the official document in the foregoing D office for the purpose of uttering, and submitted the altered test report to the employees of the U.S. U.S. headquarters in the name of the U.S. U.S. and U.S. on April 7, 2009, using a computer-based demonstration program at the time via E, which was issued on April 7, 2009 by Busan and U.S. Small and Medium Business Administration on the test report under the name of the Busan and U.S. Administrator of the U.S. Small and Medium Business Administration. After modifying the test result (Ni) of the chemical component of the test item from “10.51 to “12.03” on April 20, 2009.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant altered one copy of the test report under the name of the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration, which is an official document, and exercised the altered test report.

3. The Defendant is the victim of the aforementioned altered test report.