logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.07 2013가합59000
손해배상(의) 등
Text

The Defendants jointly share KRW 95,452,433, and KRW 25,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 5,000,000 to Plaintiff C.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On April 17, 2012 and May 20, 2013, Plaintiff A is a patient who has undergone a fluence surgery in the G Hospital jointly operated by the Defendants (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”) on two occasions, and Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the arb of Plaintiff A.

On April 10, 2012, Plaintiff A complained of symptoms, such as cocoding force, snow pain, heat, and two pains, which were first presented to Defendant Council members on April 10, 2012. As a result of the CT test conducted by the medical personnel of Defendant Council on the same day with respect to Plaintiff, Defendant Council members, the left non-Dong-dong Non-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

(1) Alleys shall be divided into the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the joints of the land

(2) A ambal-dong shall be a ambal-dong formed in the upper ambalone, exist in both sides, and is also connected to the upper ambalone below the embalone.

(3) Broughts shall be divided into the center of eyebrows around the eyebrow, and they shall be placed in the bones of bones.

(4) A terloid shall be located on the rear part and shall be located on the upper part of the terlock, and the upper part shall be located on the upper part of the terloid.

In addition, it was confirmed that there was a fluoral opinion, and the plaintiff A tried to undergo a fluoral surgery as an surgery for the symptoms at the defendant Council member.

On April 13, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Council conducted the reaction test for the Plaintiff A before an operation, the pulmonary activity test, the heart test, and the superscopic test. The special abnormal symptoms in the above examination were not confirmed.

On April 17, 2012, the medical personnel of the Defendant Council for the medical personnel of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant primary operation”) performed the secondary scopic surgery with the Plaintiff, and the secondary scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc

arrow