1. The Defendants: (a) each of the plaintiffs A was 443,206,352 won; (b) 5,000,000 won; and (c) each of the above amounts was 443,206,352 won.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 24, 2010, the parties concerned: (a) at the astronomical parent hospital operated by the Defendant’s educational foundation (hereinafter “Defendant’s educational institute”) of the Artol University (hereinafter “Defendant’s educational institute”); (b) performed mid-to-mid-to-under-under-under-under-under-to-under-under-under-under-under-to-under-under-under-under-under-under-air surgery; and (c) was administered by the Nonstooc, a non-sto-in-in-face infection control; and (d) the Plaintiff’s husband B is the Plaintiff’s husband.

Defendant C is the intensity of the instant surgery, and Defendant E is the subsidiary of the instant surgery, and Defendant D is the doctor who administered the Kenya to Plaintiff A.

B. On February 22, 2007, the Plaintiff A hospitalized in an emergency hospital at the Macheon-do University. The Plaintiff hospitalized the Plaintiff in an emergency hospital at the Macheon-do University. The medical personnel at the above hospital deemed that the Plaintiff was hysule, and had the Plaintiff hysule for hysuling the hysul to hysule to hysule the hysul.

At the time, the plaintiff A did not have any symptoms beyond anything else in relation to the Aminse medication.

C. On April 26, 2010, Plaintiff A, who was at the Defendant Hospital prior to the Defendant Hospital’s surgery, was in charge of the surgery at the Defendant Hospital on April 26, 2010, and was in charge of the surgery at the Defendant Hospital, following the symptoms of the upper part of the surgery on April 26, 2010, the Plaintiff was said to have continued to provide the Defendant Hospital’s medical professionals with an innate-type diagnosis at the Macheon-do University Vice Hospital, with an innate-do-type diagnosis, and took drugs for one year and six months due to the pulmonary tuberculosis.

B) Accordingly, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted a variety of inspections in order to clarify the causes of Plaintiff A’s symptoms, and the results are as follows. (1) The result of the examination of chest C and pulmonary functions: Although there seems to have been suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis in the past, there is no evidence of pulmonary closing, and it appears that it is not the Domination that shows the voice urine in the examination of the cause of the engine location (the result of the examination of the 2nd local vision: the result of the examination).