logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.07 2012가합82126
진료비
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) for KRW 33,157,300 and its amount from May 22, 2012.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant A related to the parties is a patient who was conducted cerebral ties surgery (hereinafter “the instant surgery”) through the opening at Korea University Hospital operated by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff Hospital”). Defendant B is a child of Defendant A.

B. Around September 22, 2008, Defendant A hospitalized in the Plaintiff Hospital due to cardiopulmonary disease and hydropulmonary disease. As a result of the Plaintiff Hospital’s brain CT test conducted on Defendant A, the medical personnel discovered that there was an initial symptoms in the fore part of the cerebrsson’s disease, and that there was a problem among the cerebrsson’s cerebrscular, and the medical personnel at the Plaintiff Hospital performed the cerebrscular test on September 29, 2008.

3) Accordingly, the medical personnel at the Plaintiff hospital had the Defendant A perform brain ties through the surgery. C) Defendant A complained of two copies to the medical personnel at the Plaintiff hospital on October 11, 2008, immediately before the instant surgery.

2) At around 12:50 on the same day, the medical personnel at the Plaintiff hospital commenced the instant surgery against Defendant A. As a result, the Plaintiff hospital opened two teams and confirmed the parts of the surgery, the brain ties near brain dose were colored, and the surrounding blood ties and ties were serious. The medical personnel at the Plaintiff hospital was exposed to the brain ties of Defendant A, with voluntary opinion of rupture, and carried out ruptures, and confirmed that the blood flow was normal after permanent ruptures. D. After the instant surgery and the Defendant A’s present condition 1), Defendant A was not recovered in the depth of the instant surgery, and the food was recovered in around October 18, 2008, and transferred from the hospital to the general hospital, but was transferred from the hospital.

arrow