1. The Defendants jointly share 403,830,957 won, Plaintiff B, and C respectively, and each of the above amounts.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff B and C died on October 26, 2016.

hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”

The plaintiff A is a parent of the deceased, and the defendant E is a medical specialist in sexual surgery who operates the J Sung-mar Medical Center (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Council member") from the 13th floor of the 13th floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I building, and the defendant F and G are doctors belonging to the defendant Council member.

B. 1) On August 26, 2016, the Deceased decided to undergo the said surgery after consultation with the Defendant Council member about the surgery on the part of the Defendant Council member on August 26, 2016. The medical staff at the Defendant Hospital did not have any particular opinion on blood coaction to the Deceased on the day. 2) The Deceased did not have any specific opinion on the part of the deceased on the day.

9. 8. Around 09:55, the Defendant Council re-explosiveed to the Defendant Council for the Agregnent surgery.

Around 12:30 on the same day, Defendant F, a medical specialist, commenced anesthesia to the Deceased (the normal conditions were the saw before the Deceased’s pressure, beer, etc.) and Defendant F, a medical specialist, started saw at the operation room. Defendant F, a medical saw saw from 12:56 on the same day to 13:59 on the same day, to have his bones planned by using saw.

In the process, a large quantity of blood transfusions were generated during the operation of the sloping reduction surgery and the sloping reduction surgery (hereinafter referred to as the “instant surgery”).

3) From 14:00 on the same day, Defendant G: (a) cleaned the Deceased’s department of the instant surgery; and (b) took measures for blood transfusion. However, as the blood transfusion continued without stopping at the part of the instant surgery, Defendant G’s assistant nurse affiliated with the Defendant G or the Defendant G’s assistant nurse who received the direction from the Defendant G continued to take measures for blood transfusion alternates. Thereafter, Defendant G was sealed the instant department of the surgery from 15:45 on the same day to 16:15 on the same day; (b) Defendant E, around 16:28 on the same day, performed the surgery at around 16:43 on the part of the instant surgery and completed the surgery (However, the surgery division, in particular, around the day when the surgery was completed, to 17:30 on the deceased’s day.