(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.01.08 2017가단25989

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.01.08 2017가단25989

임대료

Text

1. The defendant

A. The annexed drawing shall be indicated among the 820 square meters in Yansan-gu, Jeonju-si and the 165 square meters in Yansan-gu, Jeonju-si D.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. 1) On April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) on April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff: (b) the Yansan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City C 820 square meters; and (c) the 165 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”).

(2) The lease agreement between the owner of each of the instant land and the Defendant was concluded on May 2012, 2012, when the lease agreement between the owner of each of the instant land and the Defendant was concluded on May 2012.

On May 14, 2012, the Plaintiff proposed that the Defendant entered into a lease agreement by changing the monthly rent of KRW 1,000,000 to the monthly rent of KRW 1,000,000, but the Defendant rejected it. Ultimately, the Plaintiff and the Defendant decided to terminate the said lease agreement on the expiration date.

3) As above, the Defendant installed a greenhouse of 433 square meters in the ship portion 14, 15, 16, 17, and 14, among each of the instant lands, with no payment of rent to the Plaintiff until the date of termination of the lease agreement, and installed a multi-purpose toilet of 15 square meters in the ship connecting each of the points of 18, 19, 20, 21, and 18, with the same drawing indication, and a multi-purpose container of 22, 23, 24, 25, and 22, with the same drawing indication, which successively connects each point of 18,00 square meters in the ship, with the same drawing indication 26,27, 28, 28, 29, 30, and 26, and uses and benefits from each of the instant land. 4) The amount equivalent to each of the instant land from 18, 215 to 218,214,2015.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 2-1 and Eul evidence No. 2, the result of this court's request for measurement and appraisal to the previous branch office of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the result of this court's entrustment of a clinical fee appraisal to E, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is out of each land of this case to the plaintiff.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2016.12.08 2016가단16785

-수원지방법원성남지원 2016.12.14 2016가단14750

-춘천지방법원 2020.06.03 2018가단54978

-수원지방법원 2019.11.27 2019가합16225

-수원지방법원안산지원 2020.07.08 2019가단75337