logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.04.19 2018고단592
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2017, Defendants were unable to avoid disturbance by following the following: (a) Defendant A, while drinking alcohol at a singing shop in Ulsandong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

The Defendants were asked from the police officer of the F police station of the Ulsan East Eastern Police Station, who was called to the Defendants, to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case from Ha, who is a police officer belonging to the F police station of the Ulsan East East Eastern Police Station, and Defendant B was “satisfing and drinking fats within the inside, but was the crime

Defendant A committed an act that seems to be done in the course of carrying out a bath “Ising, Hasing,” and Hascing the above slope G and Hascing the above slope G and Hascing the Hasck that it could be arrested as a current offender of interference with the performance of official duties. Defendant A used the above slope G and Hascing the Hasck in body with the above slope G and Hascing the shoulder of Hascing the above Hasck in two weeks of drinking, cutting the Hasck with the floor, cutting the Hascing the Hasc and cutting the Hasck with the upper slope G in order to arrest the Defendant as a current offender. Defendant B used the above slope G to b by breaking the lower part of the above slope G to the lower part of the above slope G with the aim of arresting the Defendant as a criminal.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by the police officers and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police with regard to G and H;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. Application of each investigation report (a photograph and CD attachment) statute;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense / [Selection of imprisonment with prison labor]

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrences;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order include the Defendants’ age, occupation, sex, family relation, living environment, circumstances leading to the commission of the crime, etc.

arrow