beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 27,770,255 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from February 3, 2015 to October 7, 2015.
Reasons
1. On July 21, 2014, A is the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”) around 17:27, 2014.
(ii) while driving a vehicle and proceeding to the Home Puger on the side of the Home Puger, two-lanes in front of the D gas station in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, while proceeding to the Home Puger, the vehicle is the F taxi for E driving (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”).
2) The following parts of the first accident of this case were inferred into the front parts of the said vans (hereinafter “the first accident of this case”).
2) After the instant drilling accident, the Defendant’s vehicle driven in the future at the speed of the speed of the car, leading the handcil (hereinafter “the second accident of this case”) and continued to drive in the future at a speed of 4,5 seconds, and later, 4,5 seconds later than the point at which the first accident occurred, the part of the Defendant’s H driver’s Ike freight (hereinafter “wing freight”) signaled at approximately 43 meters from the point at which the first accident occurred, 37 to 45 kilometers at the speed of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “the third accident of this case”) followed the part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the said large bus of the J driver’s vehicle in front, which was driven at the speed of the speed of the speed of the car, and concealed the front part of the said large bus of the J driver’s vehicle in front of the said vehicle while stopping. The damaged vehicle continued to drive a large bus, and subsequently concealed the part of the said cargo after the rapid towing of the large bus.
(3) Afterward, the Defendant’s vehicle was behind L drivers’ M&A, N drivers’ O cars, and Q&A’s Q&A’s Q&A’s driving (hereinafter “the instant 4th accident”). The Defendant’s vehicle was forward and received every month (hereinafter “instant 5th accident”).
4) The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive insurance contract for the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity who entered into a mutual aid agreement for the Defendant’s vehicle.
5 The Plaintiff, by June 23, 2015, 31,782,750 won to G, as compensation for medical expenses and actual income or consolation money, shall be 31,782,750 won, 2,089,590 won to H by January 2, 2015, 2, 2,037,370 won to J by December 26, 2014, and 2,037,370 won to J by December 26, 2014.