1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 19:20 on December 13, 2014, G: (a) driven a H-to-pubed passenger vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant-to-pubed vehicle”); (b) changed the two-lanes into the two-lanes while driving a four-lane road (hereinafter “instant road”); (c) driven by the U.S.-to-pub vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant-to-pub vehicle”) in front of the U.S. subway Station in front of the U.S. subway Station in Busan, North Korea, into the two-lanes depending on the two-lanes of the road in front of the U.S. subway Station in front of the U.S. (hereinafter “instant road”); and (d) shocked the part adjacent to the Defendant-to-pubed vehicle, following the driver’s seat in the U.S.-to-pubed vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “the first accident of this case”). B.

Defendant Hask vehicle immediately sealed the first vehicle of this case into one-lane of the instant road and proceeded at one-lane of the instant road (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff Hask”) with the front side part of the Plaintiff Hask-Whn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-S

(hereinafter referred to as “the second accident of this case”). The field map of the first and second accidents of this case is as shown in the attached Form No. 1.

C. The Plaintiff suffered injury to the left-hand part of the 2nd accident of this case, such as the structural frame of the opening of the upper-hand part of the body.

Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant E”) is an insurer who has concluded each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Defendant NF Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”) with respect to Defendant NF vehicles.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements and images, Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 9, Eul's evidence No. 2 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In addition to the description and image of Gap evidence No. 9, the damage compensation liability occurred, the purport of the entire pleadings, 1. The speed of the road of this case is 80 km per hour, and the speed of the road of this case is 80 km per hour, and it is immediately immediately before the operation of defendant Bosky vehicle presumed by Ski