logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.24 2019가합578794
구상금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 147,55,610 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from October 1, 2019 to April 24, 2020.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a special corporation that performs industrial accident compensation insurance affairs entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”).

B. Defendant B is the driver of D-A-Wurd Automobile (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”); Defendant C is the owner of the Defendant vehicle; Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract regarding the Defendant vehicle.

C. On March 10, 2015, E: (a) driven a F-Apurd motor vehicle (hereinafter “accident 1 motor vehicle”); (b) stopped on the front side while driving two lanes depending on two-lanes from the training institute shooting distance to the high turbing side in the first area located in the Hasan-si, Ansan-si; (c) followed the G Driving’s Hwing and one ton cargo vehicle (hereinafter “accident 2 vehicle”) of the following: (a) 1 vehicle in the accident.

(hereinafter referred to as “the primary accident”). The J, an employee of the I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “I”) (hereinafter referred to as “B”), driven the K-wing and one ton cargo vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) following the two-vehicles of the said temporary accident. Once the first accident occurred, two vehicles were concealed (hereinafter “the second accident”) after the first accident (hereinafter “the second accident”), and the Defendant’s vehicle in close vicinity was also towed the Plaintiff vehicle immediately after the second accident.

(hereinafter referred to as “third accident”) and D. of this case by referring to each of the above accidents (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

In the instant accident, the victim suffered bodily injury, such as the fluoral rupture of fluorrative rupture, rupture rupture rupture, rupture rupture, rupture damage, rupture, blood rupture, rupture, rupture, and tension, head rupture, rupture of rupture rupture, open rupture of rupture, rupture of rupture, and rupture of rupture rupture, etc.

E. On September 30, 2019, the Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident.

arrow